Each training style has particular advantages, disadvantages and uses, and it's important to understand all three. When it comes to coaching, there are three distinct styles: autocratic, democratic and holistic. The styles are based on the studies of Kurt Lewin, a German-American social psychologist. Democratic training focuses more on communication between a coach and his athletes.
Instead of the coach having all the power in the autocratic style, a democratic coach encourages the participation of his athletes. The coach acts as a guide, overseeing suggestions that swimmers can ignore them. Ultimately, the coach has the last word, but not without the suggestions and opinions of his athletes. This allows athletes to play an important role in the team and, at the same time, foster an environment based on growth and collaboration.
Coaches will use a variety of training styles depending on the training situation. There are perhaps three training styles: autocratic (do as I say), democratic (involves athletes in decision-making) and laissez-faire. The autocratic style could be divided into two types: counting and selling and the democratic style, sharing and allowing. There is a bit of guidance in the Laissez Fair training style, as this style allows the group to do whatever they want.
Rather than establishing hierarchical control, the transformational coach acts collaboratively with the client while offering authentic support and sincere feedback (Eagly et al. These coaches “can explain the objectives and goals to their players (and can ask limited questions), but the coach has the final word regarding the way the team acts and plays. It's important to know what type of training style you respond best to in order to have a more effective and pleasant relationship with your coach. And, generally speaking, there are several qualities that should be evident in all coaches, such as excellent listening skills, confidence, optimism, open-mindedness, etc.
Of course, there are many other types of training styles in management, and there are also completely different approaches to management that are not based on a training mentality. Mindfulness coaching is based on the philosophy of mindfulness by promoting a type of awareness in which a person pays attention to their feelings and thoughts in the moment, without judging them. It has been proposed as a useful way of providing feedback in terms of leadership behaviors focused on empowerment among training managers (Konczak, Stelly, & Trusty, 2000). The autocratic coach is in control at all times and strives for perfectionism and excellence, while some may expect that certain tasks will always be performed the same way.
In this qualitative study, coaches described the importance of taking a holistic perspective with students. Coaching methods can be an effective way to address a work culture that, at best, seems unproductive and, at worst, failed. Each coach varies according to their own style and training methods; however, not all methods may be effective for each individual swimmer. These instruments measure a variety of training and leadership qualities and are useful in ensuring that a coach performs in the most effective way for his client.
Considering the many benefits of coaching, as described here, there are good reasons for people to consider using a life coach when faced with a challenge or hope to have a greater meaning in life. The best coaches know how to combine all styles with their personal experiences depending on the situation and the expected result.