When it comes to life coaching, holistic coaching is the most effective style. It is the job of a coach to be a role model and mentor to their athletes, and to do this they must consider different training styles that will help their team's performance. Studies have revealed that the least successful training style is the authoritarian approach, as it can have a detrimental psychological effect on athletes. The most successful training style for all ages is the autonomous approach.
This allows players to have freedom and the support of the coach, which creates positive psychological effects. It is essential for coaches to understand that they will have an impact on the lives of many athletes, and that no one training style is perfect. Bureaucratic coaching is less suitable for individual training and better for working with large teams. Laissez-faire coaching involves assuming the role of advisor or consultant to the team, in which coaches make themselves available to players who ask them for help and give them advice as requested.
Those looking for a coach should research different training styles to find the one that best fits their needs. Autocratic training may be necessary when only the coach has sufficient experience to make key decisions. A flexible and open training approach can recognize the fluidity of behavior in relation to context and adapt the training style as needed. Coaches who hope to guide a team with holistic training methods must first be worthy of leading others. Left unchecked, autocratic and sustained training can have the opposite effect, as it makes players feel that their coach is bossy and controlling, generates resentment and reduces motivation when expectations are too high.